A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced into a very publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to construct their family members house. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal planning disputes, where views of the sea are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the intensity from the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that these actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times was accepted and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed depending on professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not change the underlying information.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.